Since the 1990s, when people started to jump on the environmental wagon, corporations have implemented a strategy to please the concerned masses. This stragegy is widely known as “greenwashing” and it refers to the practice of false advertisement on a product that claims to be eco friendly but in reality is not. In today’s marketing world, companies spend billions of dollars in Green PR or green marketing that is why it is easy to fall prey to false advertisement. We are constantly bombarded with commercials or online ads about a company’s green strategy, whether it may be a commodity like a fuel efficient car or a basic cleaning product, consumers often fall prey to these false advertisements. Yet one way to escape being spoon fed false propaganda is to do your own research. With technology as fast as what we now call a 3G network consumers can become savvy shoppers. But if time is an issue simply visit one of these websites:]
http://stopgreenwash.org/
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Greenwashing
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/sep/10/bmw-activehybrid-x6
There are countless of helpful websites and these are among a few that I found interesting. Keep in mind that these websites have been conveniently created to provide a conscientious approach on whether a product is eco friendly or just a false illusion.As consumers we must take the initiative to investigate a corporation’s claims of sustainability. Some of the steps you could take to prevent being fooled by PRIf we choose to disregard this, it may lead to devastating damage to the earth. If we allow corporations to continue putting on a PR show on sustainability without holding them accountable for deceiving the public we are doing more harm not only to our environment but to ourselves. In 2007, one company set out to dismantle the false claims of corporations and their behavior. The company is widely known as TerraChoice Environmental Marketing Inc and throuhout it’s research it came across the “six sins of Greenwashing”. These sins are:
1. Sin of the Hidden Trade-Off: which states that a producer claims sustainability aspects of product based only in one sustainable attribute and disregards missing areas.
2. Sin of No Proof: It is based on the environmental claim that a product is sustainable but the producer has no proof.
3. Sin of Vagueness: A product’s environmental factors are presented vaguely.
4. Sin of Irrelevance: This refers to an environmental claim that is of no relevance to the product.
5. Sin of Fibbing: False propaganda.
6. Sin of Lesser of Two Evils: This refers to an environmental claim that may be true but distracts consumers from the underlying factor or lack of sustainability.




The concept of sustainability is not pushed forward by a few hands. This is the message the Mayor of Fayetteville sought to get across when he signed up the city of Fayetteville to participate in the “Cans for Cash City Recycling Challenge”. This contest was born out of the U.S. Conference of Mayors and Novelis Corporation in which cities all over the country are challenged to collect recyclable aluminum beverage cans. For the competitive and caring folks of Fayetteville, the challenge will begin October 1st and will end October 31st of 2009.

